Back to Resources
SR&ED January 23, 2026

The SR&ED Documentation Gap

Most tech companies leave $200K-$500K per year in SR&ED credits unclaimed. Learn why the documentation gap exists and how to close it.

PG

Philippe Gratton

Key Takeaway

Canadian tech companies leave $200K-$500K per year in SR&ED credits unclaimed because they can't document R&D work after the fact. Engineers don't write contemporaneous records, and retroactive documentation is expensive and incomplete. The fix is automated evidence collection from tools your team already uses: Git, Jira, Slack.

There’s a gap between what your company could claim and what it actually does claim.

For most tech companies, that gap is between $200K and $500K per year.

Some companies don’t file SR&ED claims at all, so the gap is 100%. Other companies file but conservatively. Either way, the math is stark: this is money your company is entitled to that you’re not collecting.

The Typical Math

SR&ED documentation gap typical math breakdown

Take a Series B SaaS company with 25 engineers at $200K loaded cost each:

  • Total engineering spend: $5M per year
  • Estimated R&D work: 35% of engineering = $1.75M
  • Potential credit (35% refundable): $612,500

But what actually happens:

  • If you file nothing: Gap of $612,500
  • If you file conservatively: Claim 60% of eligible = Gap of $245,000
  • If you hire a consultant: Pay $30K, claim 80% = Net of $460,000, but gap of $152,500

Across Multiple Years

5-year cumulative SR&ED documentation gap

If your company has never claimed SR&ED in 5 years:

  • Year 1-5 gaps: $300K → $450K annually
  • Total 5-year gap: $1.825 million

You can claim back 5 years. This is recoverable money.

Why the Gap Exists

Three reasons why SR&ED documentation gap exists

  1. Documentation friction — Engineers don’t naturally track SR&ED time
  2. Lack of awareness — Many companies don’t know the program exists
  3. Process complexity — Filing involves multiple steps and coordination

The Automation Trend

Companies are moving from consultant-driven documentation to software-driven automation. This closes the gap—companies using automation tools claim 85-95% of eligible work instead of 50-60%.

What To Do

If you’ve never claimed, get a rough estimate and consider filing amended returns for past 5 years. If you claim conservatively, review what eligible work you’re leaving out. If you claim fully, continue documenting rigorously.

The gap isn’t permanent. Close it, and you recover substantial money.

PG

About Philippe Gratton

A passionate technologist at Chrono Innovation, dedicated to sharing knowledge and insights about modern software development practices.

Ready to Build Your Next Project?

Let's discuss how we can help turn your ideas into reality with cutting-edge technology.

Get in Touch